A new approach for cerumenolytic treatment in children: In vivo and in vitro study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2015.04.039Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives

To demonstrate the effects of various cerumenolytic solutions in vivo and in vitro and to measure the change in pain following treatment.

Methods

The study was done as a single-centre, prospective and double-blind study. Among 1243 paediatric patients with total or nearly total occlusive plug in 4 years period, those who accepted endoscopic ear examination and cleaning via aspiration after a follow-up period of at least 10 days following treatment were included in the study. Day of total TM visualisation was noted and removal co-efficient was calculated. The pre and post-treatment pain levels of the patients were assessed using analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS).

In the in vitro part, cerumen samples collected at equal amounts from 20 patients were treated at 36–400 °C in 6 different tubes with the same solutions and their dissolution degrees were assessed over a period of 5 days (Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 48, Hour 72, Hour 92, Hour 120). Additionally, the degree of resolution in the tube treated with distilled water was considered to be the control reference.

Results

In the in vivo part of the study, total TM visualisation was observed in Group 1 at 50.2% (Day 3), in Group at 57.1%, in Group at 62.3%, in Group at 44.3% and in Group 5 at 73.5%. The group with the lowest removal co-efficient was Group 5 (removal co-efficient = 1.623).

In reference to the ACCS pain scores of the patients, the intra-group change pre-post treatment was found statistically significant for all groups (p = 0.008; p = 0.0222; p = 0.005; p = 0.026; p = 0.018). After statistical analysis between the groups the difference between Group 5 and other groups was found statistically significant (p = 0.002; p = 0.026; p = 0.044; p = 0.034).

In the in vitro part of the study, the best dissolution was observed in Group 2.

Conclusions

In our study, the best cerumenolytic solutions were identified to be glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium bicarbonate 10 cc + distilled water 10 cc. Especially the use of this mixture ease in terms of pain for the patient and in terms of time and comfort for the physician during the removal procedure.

Introduction

Cerumen (ear wax) is a common problem that can cause conductive hearing loss, irritation, pain, tinnitus, dizziness, and vertigo [1], [2], [3]. In most instances earwax causes no symptoms at all, but it can prevent adequate examination of the tympanic membranes, and this can be a problem especially when examining children having middle ear diseases.

Cerumen is a combination of glandular secretions from the outer one-third of the external auditory canal and exfoliated squamous epithelium that normally migrates out of the ear canal by a self-cleaning mechanism assisted by jaw movement [4]. Failure of this self-cleaning mechanism can lead to cerumen impaction, which Roland et al. [5] define in their clinical practice guideline as an accumulation of cerumen that causes symptoms, prevents a needed assessment of the ear canal/tympanic membrane or audiovestibular system, or both. Cerumen impaction is presented in approximately 1 in 10 children, 1 in 13 adults, and one third of geriatric and developmentally delayed populations [6], [7], [8]. There are a range of devices and techniques used to mechanically remove cerumen: syringing, irrigation and suction with magnification [9]. Cerumenolytics are topical agents used to aid cerumen removal. They can be divided into oil-based and aqueous-based agents. Cerumenolytics work by hydrating the desquamated sheets of keratinocytes and by inducing keratolysis, causing disintegration of the cerumen [10]. A wide range of cerumenolytics are available; however, it remains uncertain which are most effective in practice.

Pain is a common experience in children starting in infancy [11]. Because of the pain and difficulty involved in removing the compact plug tissue during examination especially in paediatric population, the identification of efficient cerumenolytic solutions would help facilitate aspiration and examination.

In our study, we aimed to demonstrate the effects of various cerumenolytic solutions in vivo and in vitro and to measure the change in pain following treatment.

Section snippets

Methods

Among 1243 paediatric patients with total or nearly total occlusive plug examined at the ENT diseases clinic between the dates 01/01/2011 and 01/01/2015, those who accepted endoscopic ear examination and cleaning via aspiration after a follow-up period of at least 10 days following treatment were included in the study. The pre-treatment and post-treatment pain levels of the patients were assessed using analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS). The demographic, clinical and social findings of

Results

589 males, 654 females 1243 patients raging 3–16 ages (mean age = 8.64) were included in study. A statistically significant intergroup difference was not found for demographic characteristics, Clinical findings, Social findings–events (Table 1).

The plug was cleared in spring and summer months in a majority of the patients (n = 77; 62.5%) (Fig. 1). 76.7% (n = 954) of the patients did not have any tympanic membrane visualisation. The plug was similarly bilateral in most of the patients (n = 943; 75.8%).

Discussion

Several methods and tools are used for the mechanical removal of impacted cerumen from the external auditory canal such as curette, hook, suction, forceps and syringe. Mechanical removal is a generally safe procedure; however, it has been reported to cause various otological traumas [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].

Approximately 8000 patients were observed to have several complications including ear canal laceration, tympanic membrane perforation, loss of hearing, pain, vertigo, syncope and

Conclusion

The cerumen deposited in the external auditory canal does not need to be removed unless it causes any problems. In cases where removal is required, the use of a cerumenolytic solution makes removal more convenient. In our study, the best cerumenolytic solutions were identified to be the ones used in Group 5 (glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium bicarbonate 10 cc + distilled water 10 cc). Especially the use of the mixture of glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium

References (21)

  • P.S. Roland et al.

    Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction

    Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.

    (2008)
  • C.W. Perquin et al.

    Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience

    Pain

    (2000)
  • Royal College of General Practitioners, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Department of Health

    Morbidity Statistics from General Practice: Fourth National Study, 1991–1992

    (1995)
  • T. Aung et al.

    Removal of earwax

    BMJ

    (2002)
  • H.C. Hanger et al.

    Cerumen: its fascination and clinical importance: a review

    J. R. Soc. Med.

    (1992)
  • C.C. Crandell et al.

    Incidence of excessive impacted cerumen in individuals with mental retardation: a longitidunal investigation

    Am. J. Ment. Retard.

    (1993)
  • A.C. Robinson et al.

    The efficacy of cerumenolytics: everything old is new again

    J. Otolaryngol.

    (1989)
  • M.M. Carr et al.

    Cerumenolytic efficacy in adults versus children

    J. Otolaryngol.

    (2001)
  • A.K. Mehta

    An in vitro comparison of the disintegration of human ear wax by five cerumenolytics commonly used in general practice

    Br J. Clin. Pract.

    (1985)
  • M. Grossan

    Cerumen removal – current challenges

    Ear Nose Throat J.

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • Otological problems in ichthyosis: A literature review

    2023, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
  • Establishing Healthy Lifestyle Choices Early: How to Counsel Children and Their Parents

    2022, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Application of ear drops is one of these methods.33,37 In a clinical trial by Soy and colleagues examining 1243 pediatric patients with total or nearly total occlusive cerumen, the best cerumenolytic solution was found to be a mixture of glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium bicarbonate 10 cc + distilled water 10 cc, which provided ease in terms of pain for the patient and in terms of time and comfort for the physician during the removal procedure.37 Most importantly, clinicians should identify at-risk children with obstructing cerumen in the ear canal who may not be able to express symptoms (developmentally delayed, nonverbal patients with behavioral challenges, children with fevers, children with parental concerns, or children with speech delay) and promptly refer them to an otolaryngologist for further workup with an audiogram, and treatment with cerumenolytic agents and/or manual removal requiring instrumentation.33

  • Appropriateness of Otic Quinolone Use among Privately Insured US Patients

    2020, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
  • Ear drops for the removal of ear wax

    2018, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
View full text