International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
A new approach for cerumenolytic treatment in children: In vivo and in vitro study
Introduction
Cerumen (ear wax) is a common problem that can cause conductive hearing loss, irritation, pain, tinnitus, dizziness, and vertigo [1], [2], [3]. In most instances earwax causes no symptoms at all, but it can prevent adequate examination of the tympanic membranes, and this can be a problem especially when examining children having middle ear diseases.
Cerumen is a combination of glandular secretions from the outer one-third of the external auditory canal and exfoliated squamous epithelium that normally migrates out of the ear canal by a self-cleaning mechanism assisted by jaw movement [4]. Failure of this self-cleaning mechanism can lead to cerumen impaction, which Roland et al. [5] define in their clinical practice guideline as an accumulation of cerumen that causes symptoms, prevents a needed assessment of the ear canal/tympanic membrane or audiovestibular system, or both. Cerumen impaction is presented in approximately 1 in 10 children, 1 in 13 adults, and one third of geriatric and developmentally delayed populations [6], [7], [8]. There are a range of devices and techniques used to mechanically remove cerumen: syringing, irrigation and suction with magnification [9]. Cerumenolytics are topical agents used to aid cerumen removal. They can be divided into oil-based and aqueous-based agents. Cerumenolytics work by hydrating the desquamated sheets of keratinocytes and by inducing keratolysis, causing disintegration of the cerumen [10]. A wide range of cerumenolytics are available; however, it remains uncertain which are most effective in practice.
Pain is a common experience in children starting in infancy [11]. Because of the pain and difficulty involved in removing the compact plug tissue during examination especially in paediatric population, the identification of efficient cerumenolytic solutions would help facilitate aspiration and examination.
In our study, we aimed to demonstrate the effects of various cerumenolytic solutions in vivo and in vitro and to measure the change in pain following treatment.
Section snippets
Methods
Among 1243 paediatric patients with total or nearly total occlusive plug examined at the ENT diseases clinic between the dates 01/01/2011 and 01/01/2015, those who accepted endoscopic ear examination and cleaning via aspiration after a follow-up period of at least 10 days following treatment were included in the study. The pre-treatment and post-treatment pain levels of the patients were assessed using analogue chromatic continuous scale (ACCS). The demographic, clinical and social findings of
Results
589 males, 654 females 1243 patients raging 3–16 ages (mean age = 8.64) were included in study. A statistically significant intergroup difference was not found for demographic characteristics, Clinical findings, Social findings–events (Table 1).
The plug was cleared in spring and summer months in a majority of the patients (n = 77; 62.5%) (Fig. 1). 76.7% (n = 954) of the patients did not have any tympanic membrane visualisation. The plug was similarly bilateral in most of the patients (n = 943; 75.8%).
Discussion
Several methods and tools are used for the mechanical removal of impacted cerumen from the external auditory canal such as curette, hook, suction, forceps and syringe. Mechanical removal is a generally safe procedure; however, it has been reported to cause various otological traumas [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
Approximately 8000 patients were observed to have several complications including ear canal laceration, tympanic membrane perforation, loss of hearing, pain, vertigo, syncope and
Conclusion
The cerumen deposited in the external auditory canal does not need to be removed unless it causes any problems. In cases where removal is required, the use of a cerumenolytic solution makes removal more convenient. In our study, the best cerumenolytic solutions were identified to be the ones used in Group 5 (glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium bicarbonate 10 cc + distilled water 10 cc). Especially the use of the mixture of glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium
References (21)
- et al.
Clinical practice guideline: cerumen impaction
Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
(2008) - et al.
Pain in children and adolescents: a common experience
Pain
(2000) Morbidity Statistics from General Practice: Fourth National Study, 1991–1992
(1995)- et al.
Removal of earwax
BMJ
(2002) - et al.
Cerumen: its fascination and clinical importance: a review
J. R. Soc. Med.
(1992) - et al.
Incidence of excessive impacted cerumen in individuals with mental retardation: a longitidunal investigation
Am. J. Ment. Retard.
(1993) - et al.
The efficacy of cerumenolytics: everything old is new again
J. Otolaryngol.
(1989) - et al.
Cerumenolytic efficacy in adults versus children
J. Otolaryngol.
(2001) An in vitro comparison of the disintegration of human ear wax by five cerumenolytics commonly used in general practice
Br J. Clin. Pract.
(1985)Cerumen removal – current challenges
Ear Nose Throat J.
(1998)
Cited by (5)
Otological problems in ichthyosis: A literature review
2023, International Journal of Pediatric OtorhinolaryngologyEstablishing Healthy Lifestyle Choices Early: How to Counsel Children and Their Parents
2022, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Application of ear drops is one of these methods.33,37 In a clinical trial by Soy and colleagues examining 1243 pediatric patients with total or nearly total occlusive cerumen, the best cerumenolytic solution was found to be a mixture of glycerine 10 cc + 3% hydrogen peroxide 10 cc + 10% sodium bicarbonate 10 cc + distilled water 10 cc, which provided ease in terms of pain for the patient and in terms of time and comfort for the physician during the removal procedure.37 Most importantly, clinicians should identify at-risk children with obstructing cerumen in the ear canal who may not be able to express symptoms (developmentally delayed, nonverbal patients with behavioral challenges, children with fevers, children with parental concerns, or children with speech delay) and promptly refer them to an otolaryngologist for further workup with an audiogram, and treatment with cerumenolytic agents and/or manual removal requiring instrumentation.33
Appropriateness of Otic Quinolone Use among Privately Insured US Patients
2020, Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)Ear drops for the removal of ear wax
2018, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews