International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 74, Issue 8 , Pages 849-854, August 2010

Battery ingestion in children

  • Tal Marom

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Holon, Israel
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, P.O. Box 5, 58100 Holon, Israel. Tel.: +972 3 5028651; fax: +972 3 502819.
  • ,
  • Abraham Goldfarb

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Holon, Israel
  • ,
  • Eyal Russo

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Holon, Israel
  • ,
  • Yehudah Roth

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler School of Medicine, Holon, Israel
    • Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Received 2 February 2010; received in revised form 11 May 2010; accepted 13 May 2010.

Abstract 

Introduction

Ingestion of batteries by children became more frequent in recent years, due to the increasing accessibility of electronic toys and devices to children. Due to their electrochemical composition, impacted batteries in the esophagus may cause an extensive damage. Following the removal of a battery, the post-esophagoscopy management is still controversial.

Case presentation

An otherwise healthy 8 year-old boy presented to the pediatric emergency room 3h after the unintentional swallowing of a lithium battery. On examination, the patient was diaphoretic and tachypneic. Plain PA chest film revealed a 2.5cm diameter radiopaque round object in the upper esophagus. The patient was scheduled for an urgent rigid esophagoscopy which was performed 2h after admission. Esophagoscopy findings included an impacted lithium battery in an advanced emptying process at a level of 17cm from the incisor teeth, with a 3rd degree ulcerative esophagitis. It was not possible to visualize either the distal esophagus or the stomach. A nasogastric tube was not inserted because of a significant risk for esophageal perforation if bluntly passed. Post-operative medical therapy included fasting, administration of intravenous antibiotic therapy, antacids, and steroids. Flexible esophagoscopy superior to the level of the mucosal injury performed one day later, revealed erosive esophagitis, without evidence of perforation. Upper digestive tract gastrografin swallow test performed 2 days after esophagoscopy did not demonstrate a leak from the esophagus, and oral feeding was carefully re-initiated. Treatment was discontinued the following day. Follow up on days 10 and 14 revealed a healthy child with normal swallowing.

Discussion

Battery ingestion-related injury results from direct pressure necrosis, local electrical currents and alkali leakage. Signs and symptoms of ingested battery are related to impaction duration, size of battery, battery content and peristaltic waves of the esophagus. Appropriate imaging studies should be performed to maximize identification of the foreign body before esophagoscopy. Esophageal stenting and adjuvant medical therapy (steroid therapy, antibiotic therapy and anti-reflux therapy) have a low evidence level of clinical benefit following caustic injuries from impacted batteries and spillage of their content to the esophagus. A judicious management should be tailored in each patient. Increased public and health personnel awareness is necessary to diminish the incidence of battery ingestion.

Keywords: Battery, Foreign body, Esophagus, Imaging

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-5876(10)00250-8

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.05.019

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 74, Issue 8 , Pages 849-854, August 2010