International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 74, Issue 8 , Pages 874-877, August 2010

Treatment of persistent middle ear effusion in cleft palate patients

  • C. Szabo

      Affiliations

    • Division of Otolaryngology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, United States
    • University of Connecticut School of Health Sciences, Farmington, CT, United States
  • ,
  • K. Langevin

      Affiliations

    • Craniofacial Team, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, United States
  • ,
  • S. Schoem

      Affiliations

    • Division of Otolaryngology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, CT, United States
    • University of Connecticut School of Health Sciences, Farmington, CT, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Connecticut Children's Medical Center, 282 Washington Street, Hartford, CT 06106, United States. Tel.: +1 860 545 9522; fax: +1 860 545 9214.
  • ,
  • K. Mabry

      Affiliations

    • Craniofacial Team, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, United States

Received 13 December 2009; received in revised form 22 April 2010; accepted 27 April 2010.

Abstract 

Objectives

The goals of the research project are to learn how to individualize otologic care for cleft palate patients and to be able to counsel families of children with cleft palate on the benefit of tympanostomy tubes, hearing issues and risks of multiple sets of tubes.

Methods

The study is a retrospective chart review. Patients with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip born between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2005 referred to the Connecticut Children's Medical Center Craniofacial Department were included in the study. The patients were offered individualized ear surgery (PE tube placement) only if persistent middle ear fluid was present for over 3 months with a conductive hearing impairment. The primary outcome measures included the newborn hearing screening results, number of ear tube surgeries, and complications of PE tube insertion.

Results

There were 86 patients with cleft palate spectrum with or without cleft lip (45 females and 41 males). Twelve had undocumented newborn hearing evaluations. Of the 74 evaluable results, 61 (82%) passed the newborn hearing screening, 8 (11%) failed and 5 (7%) were inconclusive. By 5 years old, 84 (98%) patients received at least one set of ear tubes for persistent middle ear fluid with conductive hearing impairment, while 2 received no tubes (2%). Of those who received ear tubes, the range was 1–6 with a mean of 1.7. Twelve patients (14%) had tympanosclerosis. Eight patients (9%) had eardrum perforation. One patient had myringoincudopexy. Of the 86 patients, 12 had undocumented newborn hearing evaluations. Of the 74 evaluable results, 61 (82%) passed the newborn hearing screening, 8 (11%) failed and 5 (7%) were inconclusive.

Conclusions

(1) The majority of children born with cleft palate do not have middle ear fluid at birth. (2) Most children with cleft palate will likely develop persistent middle ear fluid with conductive hearing loss. Risks of complications from ear tubes in cleft palate patients are few and manageable using standard sized ear tubes.

Keywords: Otitis media, Middle ear effusion, Cleft palate, Tymponostomy tubes, Hearing loss, Speech, Development

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-5876(10)00207-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.04.016

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 74, Issue 8 , Pages 874-877, August 2010