Transnasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for the treatment of lacrimal pathway stenoses in pediatric patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(03)00188-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Lacrimal pathway stenoses in pediatric patients are uncommon after the age of 1 year. Various conservative treatments (massages, hot compresses, topical antibiotics, probing and intubation of the lacrimal pathways) are generally used to resolve these disorders. When non-invasive procedures fail, dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is indicated. While this surgical procedure has traditionally been performed by an external approach, a less-invasive endonasal technique has recently been advocated. We herein review a series of six children affected by lacrimal pathway stenosis who were treated at the Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Spedali Civili, Brescia (Italy) between November 2000 and January 2002. All patients underwent successful transnasal endoscopic DCR and, to date, no re-stenoses have occurred. A review of the literature focusing on diagnostic work-up and different therapeutic options is also presented.

Introduction

Epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis are the characteristic symptoms of lacrimal outflow impairment. At birth, an extremely variable prevalence of this disorder has been reported, ranging from 6 to 84%. However, only 2–4% of lacrimal obstructions are symptomatic [1], [2], [3], [4]. Several treatments have been advocated for the resolution of lacrimal pathway stenoses, ranging from topical antibiotic therapy to dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. This surgical procedure is usually performed through an external incision at the level of the medial canthus, although in recent years more conservative approaches using transnasal endoscopic or microscopic techniques have been described [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. Herein, we report our experience on six children with lacrimal obstruction and evaluate the diagnostic procedures and different therapeutic options for treatment of this disorder.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Between November 2000 and January 2002, six children affected by congenital lacrimal pathway stenosis were admitted to the Department of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Spedali Civili, Brescia (Italy). The patient cohort consisted of three males and three females, with a mean age of 6 years (range: 2–14 yr). Lacrimal obstruction was unilateral in five children and bilateral in the remaining patient. Since birth, all subjects suffered from recurrent dacryocystitis and epiphora, which in three

Results

Neither anatomic sinonasal abnormalities nor inflammatory changes of nasal mucosa were found by nasal endoscopy. The Jones I and II tests showed the presence of an anatomic stenosis in all children.

Dacryocystography (Fig. 1) revealed an obstruction of the lacrimal sac and of the upper third of the nasolacrimal duct in two and four children, respectively. Dilatation of the proximal lacrimal system was evident in three cases. No anatomic abnormalities or sinonasal alterations were found by CT

Discussion

Embryologically, the lacrimal system originates from an epithelial column, which starts to canalize at the 12th week of gestation beginning at the most superior end and proceeds then inferiorly. This process results in a tubular system that is closed at the distal end by a thin plica called HV [19].

Once produced by the lacrimal gland proper, the accessory glands of Krause and Wolfring, and the Zeis and Meibomian glands, tears flow down medially and penetrate the lacrimal pathway through the

Conclusions

Congenital lacrimal pathway stenoses are a frequent disorder in children. The pathology usually resolves spontaneously and surgical treatment is rarely required. When necessary however, TEDCR can be considered a safe and successful treatment for saccular and post-saccular stenoses in pediatric patients.

The creation of a DCR under direct view, the absence of facial scars, short hospitalization times, a low incidence of complications, the preservation of the pump mechanism of tearing, and

Acknowledgements

The paper has been presented as a poster at the 8th International Congress of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Oxford, UK, September 11–14, 2002.

References (42)

  • B. Ram et al.

    The technique of endoscopy in the evaluation of nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children

    Rhinology

    (2000)
  • A.A. Tahat

    Dacryostenosis in newborns: probing, or syringing, or both?

    Eur. J. Ophthalmol.

    (2000)
  • A. Yagci et al.

    Probing and bicanalicular silicone tube intubation under nasal endoscopy in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

    Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.

    (2000)
  • C.E. Sener et al.

    Reappraisal of probing of the congenital obstruction of the nasolacrimal system: is nasal endoscopy essential?

    Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol.

    (2001)
  • M. Onerci

    Dacryocystorhinostomy. Diagnosis and treatment of nasolacrimal canal obstructions

    Rhinology

    (2002)
  • R. Weber et al.

    Die endonasale mikrochirurgische Behandlung von Tränenwegsstenosen. Indikation, Technik und Ergebnisse

    HNO

    (1993)
  • Ph. Eloy et al.

    Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: indications, technique and results

    Rhinology

    (1995)
  • M.J. Cunningham et al.

    Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children

    Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.

    (1998)
  • J.F. Wong et al.

    A multidisciplinary approach to atypical lacrimal obstruction in childhood

    Ophthal. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.

    (1999)
  • R. Mladina et al.

    Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for dacryocystocoele in a 4 month old infant

    Br. J. Ophthalmol.

    (2001)
  • J.C. Flanagan et al.

    Diseases of the lacrimal drainage apparatus

  • Cited by (27)

    • Endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in children: Our experience

      2017, International Journal of Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Silicon tubing is a controversial issue in the literature. Some preferred to use it in all their cases whereas others used it only in situations where a canalicular stenosis was suspected or in revision cases [3,8,17,22–24]. We used lacrimal stenting only in 13 cases which presented to us with chronic symptoms or a formed lacrimal fistula.

    • The outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in children: A systematic review

      2015, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Silicone tubing is a controversial issue in the literature and appears common both for external and endoscopic DCR. Some authors place it in all their cases when others use it only in situations in which canalicular stenosis is suspected or in case of revision surgery [13–15,43,44]. The purpose of nasolacrimal stanting is to maintain DCR ostium patency but there is evidence that it may rather increase the changes of failure by inciting granulomatous inflammation at nasolacrimal fistula site [45].

    • Pediatric endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

      2013, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    • Primary pediatric endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy-A review of 58 procedures

      2010, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
      Citation Excerpt :

      A debate continues on the proper timing and procedures for treatment of CNDLO. The DCR is seldom needed in recalcitrant cases of a CNDLO resistant to massages, irrigation, imposibility to probe the nasolacrimalt duct and/or in some traumatic injuries of the lacrimal system and history of relapsing dacryocystitis in children under 1 year of age [1,3–11]. Refractory cases have been historically managed by external dacryocystorhinostomy (EXT-DCR).

    • Pediatric endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy

      2009, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
    • Endoscopic management of pediatric nasolacrimal anomalies

      2008, Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text