Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 71-77 (January 2003)


View previous. 7 of 22 View next.

Craniometaphyseal dysplasia: a case report and review of medical and surgical management

William M. SheppardCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Robert J. Shprintzen, Sherard A. Tatum, Charles I. Woods

Received 9 May 2002; received in revised form 13 August 2002; accepted 14 August 2002.

Abstract 

Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD) is a genetic syndrome involving cranial and tubular bone anomalies that commonly present at a young age, often with otolaryngologic manifestations. In this paper, we report a rare case of a sporadic form of the disease resulting in an early state of hypocalcemia with secondary hyperparathyroidism. A conductive hearing loss is also documented prior to 12 months of age. The clinical aspects of CMD will be covered along with its pathogenesis. The current concepts surrounding medical and surgical treatments will be reviewed, and the management of our patient will be discussed.

Article Outline

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Case report

2.1. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD)

2.2. Pathogenesis of CMD

2.3. Medical therapy of CMD

2.4. Surgical therapy of CMD

3. Discussion

4. Conclusion

Acknowledgment

References

Copyright

1. Introduction 

return to Article Outline

Osteochondrodysplasias represent a number of congenital malformation syndromes consisting of a developmental dysplasia of chondroosseous tissue. Craniotubular dysplasias (CTD) are a subset of the osteochondrodysplasias and represent modeling errors of tubular and cranial bones. In CTD, the dysplastic features of the affected bones are more impressive than the sclerotic or hyperostotic features. Classically, the syndromes are not obvious at birth. Pyle is credited for documenting the first case of a CTD in 1931 [1]. In 1935, Gemmel coined the term Leontiasis ossia to describe a patient with severe facial abnormality secondary to hyperostosis [2]. However, it was a landmark paper in 1969 by Gorlin and colleagues that defined the craniotubular dysplasias and delineated several variants [3]. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD), both autosomal dominant (AD) and autosomal recessive (AR) forms were recognized as distinct clinical entities in Gorlin's review.

Following Gorlin's review, there has been debate over how to classify the osteochondrodysplasias [4], [5], [6]. In 1992, CMD was classified as dysplasias with increased bone density and metaphyseal involvement [7]. This classification scheme was based exclusively on radiodiagnostic criteria. With the focus on radiographic findings in the craniotubular dysplasias, there has been somewhat less focus on the clinical manifestations of these rare disorders. The case reported below illustrates the clinical features of CMD that are likely to present to otolaryngologists.

2. Case report 

return to Article Outline

The proband was the 2950 g product of a full term spontaneous vaginal delivery. She was discharged on day 2 of life after an uneventful hospital course. Pregnancy was complicated only by cigarette use, one pack per day. There is a normal female sibling who is 2 years older.

At 4 weeks of age, she was admitted for failure to thrive and was noted to have an ‘unusual facial appearance’. Laboratory studies showed hypocalcemia with an ionized calcium level of 0.95 mg/dl (nr 1.13–1.37). A vitamin D 25-hydroxy level was slightly low at 13.2 ng/ml (nr11–41), and there was hyperparathyroidism with a parathyroid hormone (PTH) level of 832 pg/ml (nr 9–52). An alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level was 1839 U/l (nr 117–390). Karyotype was normal. A plain radiograph of her knee revealed no evidence of rickets. Calcium supplements and Vitamin D supplementation were started and her formula was changed. At an outpatient visit 2 weeks later, she was noted to be slightly hyperteloric with minimal facial expression. A repeat Vitamin D 25-hydroxy level was 90 ng/ml (nr 6–42) and her vitamin D supplements were discontinued. One month later, she was noted to have bilateral epiphora and nasal congestion. Over the next 2 months, she exhibited little weight gain and was readmitted at 5 months of age for failure to thrive. Weight was 4.1 kg (<5th centile), head circumference was 42 cm (50th centile), and length was 63 cm (40th centile). An otolaryngologic consultation was requested. Hypertelorism, a broad nasal root, bilateral facial nerve palsy, epiphora, and nasal obstruction were found. Flexible fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy showed severely narrowed nasal passages bilaterally with markedly enlarged inferior turbinates and extremely narrowed posterior choanae secondary to bony overgrowth. A thorough family history did not reveal any evidence of craniofacial or skeletal abnormalities in their pedigree. A maxillofacial computed tomography scan showed diffuse cortical thickening of the facial bones and base of skull with foraminal narrowing (Fig. 1). Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was normal. A skeletal survey was performed, and the distal femur was noted to have a widened metaphysis with thinning of the cortex (Fig. 2). The diagnosis of CMD was made. Over the next week, she was intermittently gavage fed until her oral intake improved.


Fig. 1. Maxillofacial CT-axial (a) and coronal (b, c) images, bone windows: Note the diffuse bony sclerosis and cortical thickening resulting in bony narrowing of the nasal vault, hyperostotic sphenoid wings, enlarged posterior body of the mandible, and diffuse involvement of the maxilla.



View full-size image.

Fig. 2. Plain radiograph of the left femur: note the metaphyseal flaring and mild diaphyseal sclerosis.


At 7 months of age, she was gaining weight, but had sparse hair and no erupted primary dentition. A repeat PTH level was normal at 50 pg/ml (nr 10–65). At 9 months of age, bilateral tympanostomy tubes were placed secondary to recurrent acute otitis media. Intraoperatively, the left middle ear contained some serous fluid, while her right middle ear space was dry. Brainstem audiometry, after ventilation tube insertion, showed an absolute latency of wave V with wave 1 delays consistent with bilateral conductive hearing loss. A repeat skeletal survey was obtained and revealed further widening of the distal metaphyses confirming the diagnosis of CMD.

2.1. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD) 

In 1954, Jackson et al. coined the term craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD) [8]. By 1997, 65 cases had been documented [9]. CMD is generally divided into two major types, autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive, although other variants have been documented [10].

Autosomal dominant CMD is the most common form. Most cases involve familial clusters of Caucasian descent. In a large German pedigree, autosomal dominant CMD was localized to within approximately 4 cM on the 5p chromosome locus [11]. The disease can present in infancy with bilateral choanal narrowing secondary to bony sclerosis, paranasal bossing, and ocular hypertelorism [9], [12] These features tend to regress with growth and may be absent by adulthood [13]. Visual impairment or facial paralysis occasionally occur, and most patients develop a mixed hearing loss with sparing of labyrinthine function [13]. Olfactory problems are often overlooked [14]. Frontonasal hyperostosis and sclerosis lead to prominence of the forehead. Prognathism is common. Other radiographic features include non-sclerotic widening of the metaphyses with cortical thinning that is most obvious at the lower end of the femur. The metaphyseal flaring results in an Erlenmeyer flask appearance in childhood, and a club-shaped deformity in adulthood. Diaphyseal hyperostosis and sclerosis can be seen in the young but disappears with age [15]. Short tubular bones have similar changes, and the pelvis and spine are normal. The cognitive prognosis for these patients is good, since the disease normally abates during the third decade of life. As is true in most autosomal dominant genetic disorders, there is considerable variability of expression in this syndrome.

The autosomal recessive form of CMD is less common. The carrier frequency is not known. The autosomal recessive CMD locus, from a four generation inbred family with ten affected individuals, was recently located to a 7 cM interval on chromosome 6q21–22 [18]. Craniofacial features are similar to the autosomal dominant form, except that there appears to be more pronounced facial involvement. Cranial nerve involvement is also more common, and the skull and mandible are larger and thicker. Marked nasofrontal bulging is evident in most cases and nasal obstruction is generally complete. Metaphyseal flaring is similar to the dominant form. Diaphyseal sclerosis is more apparent in the recessive form and can be found in adults with the disease [16].

2.2. Pathogenesis of CMD 

The specific abnormalities in bony remodeling that result in CMD remain unknown. Recent research points towards abnormal osteoclastic activity in the development of CMD. Yamamoto and colleagues discovered that osteoclast-like cells from a patient with CMD lacked expression of an osteoclast-reactive vacuolar pump [17]. The authors postulated that osteoclast regulatory dysfunction could alter bone resorption, thereby increasing bony remodeling and resulting in increased bone formation. Reichenberger et al. identified mutations in the ANK gene in five families with inherited and five cases of sporadic autosomal dominant CMD [18]. ANK is a transmembrane multipass protein that is involved in the transport or cotransport of intracellular pyrophosphate (PPi) into the extracellular matrix [19]. The authors proposed that the mutations inhibit proper complex formation with skeletal PPi, resulting in increased bone density and preventing osteoclasts from remodeling cranial bone at a normal rate [18].

Others believe that either a defect in osteoblast activity or differentiation is the major factor in the increased bone remodeling based on histological specimens revealing abnormal levels or formations of osteoblasts [9], [16], [20].

2.3. Medical therapy of CMD 

Because data is scarce concerning the specific pathogenesis of CMD, medical treatment has been based on the understanding of calcium homeostasis and the regulation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts. There are two major treatment regimens for CMD.

The first is calcitonin therapy. Calcitonin inhibits bone resorption primarily through osteoclast suppression and secondarily by impeding bone formation through feedback coupling to limit osteoblast activity. The perceived long-term result is one of decreased bone remodeling with no overall change in bone density [21]. Fanconi et al. reported a sporadic case of CMD presenting at 6 weeks of age with nasal obstruction and mild bilateral facial paralysis [20]. The patient was found to have hypocalcemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism, and calcitonin treatment was begun. The serum levels of calcium and parathyroid hormone normalized, but the disease continued to progress. In 1996, Haverkamp et al. evaluated calcitonin therapy in a patient with CMD and found no success [12].

The other treatment is a low calcium diet and calcitriol. A low oral intake of calcium promotes a hypocalcemic state that stimulates osteoclast activation. Calcitriol is then prescribed to stimulate the resorption of bone. In primate blood marrow, calcitriol has been found to cause the formation of multinucleated osteoclasts on actively remodeling bone surfaces [22]. Key et al. reported an infant with CMD who responded to treatment with a low calcium diet for 1 week (10 mg/kg per day) followed by calcitriol therapy [23]. The infant's facial paralysis improved, and there was decreased density of the skull. Mandibular and calvarial sclerosis were present early in the course of the disease and had improved prior to therapy. Although the patient's disease may have regressed without treatment, the authors concluded that spontaneous regression would be rare in a case that presented with cranial nerve problems in infancy. A low calcium diet followed by calcitriol therapy was credited with halting the progression of a facial abnormality in a 2-year-old female with CMD [24].

2.4. Surgical therapy of CMD 

Most patients with CMD will develop some degree of a mixed hearing loss. Since foraminal narrowing is a rare event in CMD, early SNHL is generally not evident. In 1969, Kietzer and Paparella reported findings in four patients who underwent exploratory tympanotomies; all had a mixed hearing loss and all had bony overgrowth including the annulus, the ossicles, and the footplate [25]. The mastoids were minimally if at all aerated. One stapedotomy was attempted. The hearing was subjectively better, but no audiogram was obtained. Other attempts at stapedotomy were aborted. In 1981, Shea et al. were able to document a significant decrease the air-bone gap in a CMD patient after stapedectomy and placement of a total ossicular reconstruction prosthesis [26]. In 1996, Franz et al. operated on two patients with CMD [27]. The stapes was mobile, but the malleus and incus were fixed. An insertion of a Wehr's prosthesis was successful, and there was documented closure of the air-bone gap in at least one ear in both patients. Of note, there was no long-term follow up in this report.

The craniofacial aberrations seen in CMD can be extremely disfiguring impacting both the form and function of the craniofacial skeleton. In 1967, Millard et al. reported the first two cases of craniofacial surgery in CMD [28]. The first case was performed on a male aged 17 and involved bony remodeling of the patient's forehead, nose, maxilla, and mandible. An aesthetically pleasing cosmetic result was obtained and the patient's quality of life was markedly improved. Bony decompression was performed in a similar manner on the patient's younger sister and resulted in a postoperative death within 24 h. An autopsy revealed a narrowed foramen magnum and chronic acute herniation of the cerebellar tonsil. Laurian and colleagues reported successful Leforte I advancement in a CMD patient with Class III occlusion [29]. Fanconi and colleagues, in 1988, performed a bifrontal craniectomy with orbital roof resection and decompression of cranial nerves on a 20-month-old with severe CMD [20]. A repeat procedure was performed at 5 years of age secondary to restenosis. By 8 years of age, the patient had again worsened and was suffering from foramen magnum compression, impaired hearing and vision. Satoh et al. performed bilateral optic nerve decompressions on a 6-year-old with deteriorating vision that resulted in immediate postoperative bilateral blindness [30]. The authors noted that there has been no successful report of optic canal decompression for threatened visual deterioration in CMD. The authors speculated that the optic nerve was receiving its blood supply from the thick surrounding bone of the optic canal and that damage can occur from an ischemic event. In 1996, Haverkamp et al. performed a bilateral inferior turbinate conchotomy with shortening of the posterior nasal septum and relieved nasal obstruction in a neonate with CMD [12]. Feingold reported 28-year follow up in a patient with CMD [31]. The patient had undergone a radical osteoplasty of the mandible, bilateral optic nerve decompression (twice), and also experienced post surgical osteomyelitis of his frontal bone requiring surgery. The patient has had no significant change over the last 10 years, but was legally blind with moderately severe mental retardation.

3. Discussion 

return to Article Outline

Sporadic cases of CMD are rare and difficulty arises in determining a new dominant mutation from a recessive inheritance pattern [12], [15], [18], [20], [23]. Clinically, one can not reliably distinguish between the autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive forms of the disease. From her presentation and clinical findings, she appears to have a more severe form of the disease. Her failure to thrive from 4 to 6 months of age was the result of poor oral intake secondary to her increasing nasal obstruction. Originally, the diagnosis of craniodiaphyseal dysplasia was considered secondary to her early facial palsy, impressive cranial involvement, and diaphyseal sclerosis present on her skeletal series at 6 months of age. However, a repeat skeletal series at 10 months of age clearly depicted significant metaphyseal flaring with minimal diaphyseal involvement.

There has been only two other reports of a CMD patient with secondary hyperparathyroidism [9], [20]. An early presentation and diagnosis of CMD is a common finding in the three cases. One can hypothesize that, early in the course of the disease, severe cases of CMD may experience transient elevations in PTH levels as the body tries to mobilize calcium stores to keep pace with increased bony remodeling. Within a 6-week interval, our patient's PTH level had precipitously dropped back to normal. This sudden decrease may be related to the calcium supplementation that she received due to transient finding of hypocalcemia. At this point, the significance or etiology of these findings remains unknown.

Our patient's ALP levels have been exceptionally elevated throughout the course of her disease. She is currently 18 months old and a recent ALP level was 1092 U/l. The elevated ALP level may predict a more chronically severe form of CMD, but this is much less clear. Thus far, we have refrained from beginning any long-term medical therapy. After thoroughly reviewing the literature, there does not appear to be a substantial benefit from initiating either calcitonin therapy or a low calcium diet with calcitriol therapy. Currently, her disease appears to have stabilized, and she is on no medications.

Our case also represents one of the few documented brainstem audiometric results in CMD. The findings suggest that conductive hearing loss can begin early in the course of the disease. Our patient may benefit from reconstructive middle ear surgery later in life. If her craniofacial disease remains stable, we would consider bony recontouring only once the patient is of age to make decisions regarding her care. Craniofacial surgery on patients with progressive disease, especially children, has a significantly high rate of failure. She would need evaluation for increased intracranial pressures prior to any surgical endeavor.

Although not mentioned elsewhere, we advocate that all patients with CMD undergo routine ophthalmologic examinations to assess for possible increases in intracranial pressures or any visual loss. A successful outcome of foramen magnum decompression for cervicomedullary encroachment in a patient with CMD has been reported [32]. The authors advocated decompression for life-threatening conditions only and warned of a higher incidence of significant post-surgical complications in this population. Performing an elaborate procedure to hopefully halt the progression of visual loss is not recommended, since it may actually hasten the visual deterioration. A more conservative approach of correcting an early visual abnormality with refractions is a simple way to improve quality of life in these patients.

4. Conclusion 

return to Article Outline

CMD is a rare diseases that, when encountered, can present varying dilemmas to a clinician. Differentiating between CMD and other craniotubular syndromes can be difficult, especially when a case is identified at an early age. Often, the establishment of a firm diagnosis requires patience and following serial skeletal radiographs. Continuing advancements in the field of genetics and cellular biology will most likely be pivotal in aiding the diagnosis and elucidating the pathogenesis of these disorders. Surgical management of CMD patients can be successfully undertaken with proper preoperative evaluation, planning, and patient selection.

Acknowledgements 

return to Article Outline

We would like to thank Dr Stanley Makoviac, MD, Dr Robert Gorlin, DDS and Dr Michael Whyte, MD for reviewing our clinical and radiographic data.

References 

return to Article Outline

[1]. [1] Pyle E. A case of unusual bone development. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1931;29:844.

[2]. [2] Gemmel GH. Leontiasis ossia. A clinical and roentgenographic entity. Radiology. 1935;25:723.

[3]. [3] Gorlin RJ, Spranger J, Koszalka MF. Genetic craniotubular bone dysplasias and hyperostosis. A critical analysis. Birth Defects: Orig. Article Ser. 1969;5(4):79–95.

[4]. [4] Dreyer SD, Zhou G, Lee B. The long and the short of it: developmental genetics of the skeletal dysplasias. Clin. Genet. 1998;54(4):464–473. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[5]. [5] Greenspan A. Sclerosing bone dysplasias—a target-site approach. Skel. Radiol. 1991;20(8):561–583.

[6]. [6] Felix R, Hofstetter W, Cecchini MG. Recent developments in the understanding of the pathophysiology of osteopetrosis. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1996;134(2):143–156. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[7]. [7] Beighton P, Giedion ZA, Gorlin R, Hall J, Horton B, Kozlowski K, et al.  International classification of osteochondrodysplasias, International Working Group on Constitutional Diseases of Bone. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1992;44(2):223–229. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[8]. [8] Jackson WPU, Albright F, Drewry G, Hanelin J, Rubin HI. Metaphyseal dysplasia, epiphyseal dysplasia, diaphyseal dysplasia, and related constitutions. Arch. Intern. Med. 1954;94:871.

[9]. [9] Cheung VG, Boechat MI, Barrett CT. Bilateral choanal narrowing as a presentation of craniometaphyseal dysplasia. J. Perinatol. 1997;17(3):241–243. MEDLINE

[10]. [10] Langer LO, Brill PW, Afshani E, Williams CA, Thomas IT, Frias JL. Radiographic features of craniometaphyseal dysplasia, wormian bone type. Skel. Rad. 1991;20(1):37–41.

[11]. [11] Chandler D, Tinschert S, Lohan K, Harrop K, Goldblatt J, Nagy M. Refinement of the chromosome 5p locus for craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Hum. Genet. 2001;108:394–397. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[12]. [12] Haverkamp F, Emons D, Streahler-Pohl HJ, Zerres K. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia as a rare cause of a severe neonatal nasal obstruction. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 1996;34(1-2):159–164. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (368 KB) | CrossRef

[13]. [13] Beighton P. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia (CMD), autosomal dominant form. J. Med. Genet. 1995;32(5):370–374. MEDLINE

[14]. [14] Kirkpatrick DB, Rimoin DL, Kaitila I, Goodman SJ. The craniotubular bone modeling disorders: a neurosurgical introduction to rare skeletal dysplasias with cranial nerve compression. Surg. Neurol. 1977;7(4):221–232. MEDLINE

[15]. [15] Macpherson RI. Craniodiaphyseal dysplasia, a disease or group of diseases?. J. Can. Assoc. Radiol. 1974;25(1):22–33. MEDLINE

[16]. [16] Iughetti PL, Alonso G, Wilcox W, Alonso N, Passos-Bueno MR. Mapping of the autosomal recessive (AR) craniometaphyseal dysplasia locus to chromosome region 6q21–22 and confirmation of genetic heterogeneity for mild AR spondylocostal dysplasia. Am. J. Med. Genet. 2000;95(5):482–491. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[17]. [17] Yamamoto T, Kurihara N, Yamaoka K, Ozono K, Okada M, Yamamoto K. Bone marrow-derived osteoclast-like cells from a patient with craniometaphyseal dysplasia lack expression of osteoclast-reactive vacuolar proton pump. J. Clin. Invest. 1993;91(1):362–367. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[18]. [18] Reichenberger E, Tiziani V, Watanabe S, Park L, Ueki Y, Santanna C. Autosomal dominant craniometaphyseal dysplasia is caused by mutations in the transmembrane protein ANK. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2001;68(6):1321–1326. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[19]. [19] Ho AM, Johnson MD, Kingsley DM. Role of the mouse ANK gene in control of tissue calcification and arthritis. Science. 2000;289(5477):265–270. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[20]. [20] Fanconi S, Fischer JA, Weiland P, Giedion A, Boltshauser E, Olah A. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia with increased bone turnover and secondary hyperparathyroidism: therapeutic effect of calcitonin. J. Pediatr. 1988;112(4):587–591. Full-Text PDF (1661 KB) | CrossRef

[21]. [21] Cole DEC, Cohen MM. A new look at craniometaphyseal dysplasia. J. Pediatr. 1988;112(4):577–579. Full-Text PDF (287 KB) | CrossRef

[22]. [22] Roodman GD, Ibbotson KJ, MacDonald BR, Kuehl TJ, Mundy GR. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 causes formation of multinucleated cells with several osteoclast characteristics in cultures of primate marrow. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1985;82(23):8213–8217. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[23]. [23] Key LL, Volberg F, Baron R, Anast CS. Treatment of craniometaphyseal dysplasia with calcitriol. J. Pediatr. 1988;112(4):583–587. Full-Text PDF (2165 KB) | CrossRef

[24]. [24] Richards A, Brain C, Dillon MJ, Bailey CM. Craniometaphyseal and craniodiaphyseal dysplasia, head and neck manifestations and management. J. Laryngol. Otol. 1996;110(4):328–338. MEDLINE

[25]. [25] Kietzer G, Paparella MM. Otolaryngological disorders in craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Laryngoscope. 1969;79(5):921–941. CrossRef

[26]. [26] Shea JR, Gerbe R, Ayani N. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia: the first successful surgical treatment for associated hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 1981;91(8):1369–1374.

[27]. [27] Franz DC, Horn KL, Aase J. Craniometaphyseal dysplasia: operative findings and treatment. Am. J. Otol. 1996;17(2):283–287. MEDLINE

[28]. [28] Millard DR, Maisels DO, Batstone JHF, Yates BW. Craniofacial surgery in craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Am. J. Surg. 1967;113(5):615–621. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[29]. [29] Laurian N, Zohar Y. Correction of maxillary retrognathia in a case of craniometaphyseal dysplasia. J. Oral. Surg. 1980;38(8):609–612.

[30]. [30] Satoh K, Iwata T, Ikeda H. Unsuccessful consequence of optic canal decompression for a case of craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1994;94(5):705–708. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[31]. [31] Feingold M. 28-year follow-up of the craniofacial findings in a patient with craniometaphyseal dysplasia. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1999;86(5):501–502. MEDLINE | CrossRef

[32]. [32] Day RA, Park TS, Ojemann JG, Kaufman BA. Foramen magnum decompression for cervicomedullary encroachment in craniometaphyseal dysplasia: case report. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(4):960–964. CrossRef

Department of Otolaryngology/ Communicative Disorders Unit, SUNY-Upstate Medical University, 750 East Adams St., Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author

PII: S0165-5876(02)00289-6


View previous. 7 of 22 View next.