International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 67-70, January 2003

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children

  • Katrien Vermeire

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Communication Disorders, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Antwerp (Edegem), Belgium
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +32-38-213-442; fax: +32-38-250-536
  • ,
  • Jan P.L. Brokx

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Communication Disorders, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Antwerp (Edegem), Belgium
    • Department of Audiology, Institute for the Deaf, Sint-Michielsgestel, 's Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
  • ,
  • Paul H. Van de Heyning

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Communication Disorders, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Antwerp (Edegem), Belgium
  • ,
  • Ellen Cochet

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Communication Disorders, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Antwerp (Edegem), Belgium
  • ,
  • Hilde Carpentier

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Communication Disorders, University of Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650 Antwerp (Edegem), Belgium

Received 5 February 2002; received in revised form 13 August 2002; accepted 14 August 2002.

Abstract 

Aims: to determine the benefit of bilateral cochlear implantation in a child on speech and language development. Method: This child got her first implant, a Nucleus 24-system, on the right side at the age of 2.5 years. The left side was implanted at the age of 4.4 years with a Nucleus 24Contour-system. On the right side she's now wearing an Esprit 24-speechprocessor (SPR). On the left side she has a Sprint-SPR. M. goes to a mainstream school and receives Speech and Language therapy in a Speech and Hearing Rehab Centre. The etiology of her deafness was hyperbilirubinemia. Auditory capacity and speech recognition tests were performed for both ears separately and together. Results: Aided thresholds give a PTA of 28 dBA with the first implant, 22 dBA with the second implant and with both implants we get a PTA of 23 dBA. Results for speech identification and recognition demonstrated an increased performance when both implants are used together. Speech and language development was equivalent to the mean of age 4.5. At the time of testing M. was 4.8 years. At this time the speech and language development show no delays with normal hearing children. Conclusions: bilateral cochlear implantation in children may have additional value for their speech and language development. Also, implantation may be considered when auditory neuropathy is likely.

Keywords: Cochlear implantation, Bilateral cochlear implantation, Hyperbilirubinemia, Auditory neuropathy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0165-5876(02)00286-0

International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Volume 67, Issue 1 , Pages 67-70, January 2003